Phosphorus pollution is a major issue for Maryland’s waterways, especially the Chesapeake Bay. Excess phosphorus leads to harmful algal blooms and dead zones, threatening aquatic ecosystems. Maryland must cut phosphorus pollution by 48% by 2025 under the Chesapeake Clean Water Blueprint. Here’s how phosphorus filters are helping:

• Key Pollution Sources: Agriculture (45% of phosphorus runoff) and urban/suburban runoff (now the second-largest source).
• Filter Systems in Use:
  • Bioretention Systems: Remove 59% of total phosphorus (up to 80%).
  • Multiple Pond Systems: Achieve 60% removal on average.
  • Infiltration Systems: Can remove 100% phosphorus where infiltration is possible.
  • Media Filters: Provide consistent performance but limited to 50%-55% removal.
• Challenges: Maryland’s varied soil types (sandy, clay-heavy) affect system efficiency. Soluble phosphorus remains difficult to remove with most systems.

Quick Comparison

*For infiltrated portion only.

Maryland’s efforts focus on balancing effective filtration methods with site-specific challenges, aiming to protect the Chesapeake Bay while meeting strict regulatory goals.

Optimization of Bioretention Soil Mix for Nutrient Removal

1. Maryland Phosphorus Filter Systems

Phosphorus filtration systems in Maryland show varying levels of effectiveness depending on the technology and the region’s unique environmental factors. From the sandy soils of the Eastern Shore to the clay-heavy terrain near Baltimore, the state’s regulatory framework and soil conditions play a big role in system performance.

Bioretention systems with underdrains are at the forefront of phosphorus removal, achieving an average total phosphorus (TP) removal rate of 59%, with peak performance reaching up to 80% ^[4]. However, these systems do not remove soluble phosphorus ^[4].

Multiple pond systems perform slightly better on average, with a 60% TP removal rate and a maximum efficiency of 75% ^[4].

Traditional media and vegetative filters provide consistent performance across Maryland’s diverse soils, with an average TP removal rate of 50% and a maximum of 55% ^[4].

Infiltration systems are highly effective, achieving 100% phosphorus removal in areas where infiltration occurs ^[4]. However, Maryland’s varied soil permeability often limits full infiltration, leaving some stormwater untreated.

In a notable example, a military base in Maryland upgraded its wastewater treatment facility in 2011, installing NEI-Organica‘s Blue PRO® system. This system uses ferric oxide-coated sand to meet stringent discharge limits of 0.3 mg/L TP ^[6].

The Maryland Department of the Environment has also approved systems like StormFilter technologies, which feature maintenance intervals ranging from one to five years ^[7]. These extended intervals are particularly helpful for municipalities working to meet Chesapeake Bay restoration goals.

*For infiltrated portion only

These figures underscore the importance of choosing filtration systems that match the unique conditions of each site. Maryland’s varied soils – from clay-rich coastal plains to inland geologies – can pose challenges for phosphorus filtration. Additionally, cost estimates for stormwater management practices gathered from Maryland Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System counties reveal significant differences based on system complexity and site-specific factors ^[5].

With this knowledge, Pro Landscapes MD integrates these proven phosphorus removal technologies into comprehensive stormwater management strategies. By leveraging extensive experience with central Maryland’s diverse soil conditions, they recommend the most effective solutions, ensuring compliance with regulations and reliable long-term results.

2. Midwest Phosphorus Filter Systems

While Maryland contends with urban runoff, the Midwest faces a different challenge: managing phosphorus in a region dominated by agriculture and unpredictable weather patterns. With the Midwest producing an impressive 36% of the world’s corn grain ^[13], fertilizer runoff significantly contributes to phosphorus pollution, demanding tailored filtration solutions.

Agricultural Impact and Phosphorus Levels

Phosphorus levels in Midwest stormwater vary depending on land use. Open spaces show lower concentrations (0.19 mg/L), while residential areas see higher levels (0.32 mg/L). Agricultural lands, however, stand out, losing between 4% and 9% of applied fertilizer phosphorus through runoff ^[8][10]. Urban areas contribute their share too, exporting 1–3 pounds of phosphorus per acre annually. What’s particularly concerning is that around 95% of the dissolved phosphorus entering water bodies like Lake Erie is immediately available for algae growth, compared to just 30% of particulate phosphorus ^[8]. This makes targeting dissolved phosphorus a priority for effective treatment in the region.

Advanced Filtration Technologies

Traditional green infrastructure, such as grass swales and bioretention systems, often struggles with phosphorus removal and can even release it back into the environment ^[9]. On the other hand, advanced systems like high-rate biofiltration (HRBF) and high-rate media filtration (HRMF) have demonstrated consistent success in removing total phosphorus without the leaching issues associated with older methods ^[9]. These technologies are particularly beneficial in the Midwest, where soils like sandy loams have a low capacity to absorb phosphorus ^[13].

Municipal Success Stories

The City of Medford, Wisconsin, provides a standout example of cost-effective phosphorus management. By installing a disk filtration system with chemical feed, the city slashed its phosphorus discharge from an average of 0.64 mg/L over ten years to just 0.04 mg/L, meeting permit requirements ahead of schedule and saving millions in the process.

"Prior to this project, our 10-year average for phosphorus was 0.64 mg/l; we are now averaging 0.04 mg/l with our new system, meeting our permit requirements years ahead of schedule." – John Fales, Former City Coordinator ^[12]

This success has inspired other Midwest cities like Brookfield, Wausau, and La Crosse to adopt similar systems, proving that effective phosphorus management doesn’t have to break the bank.

The Role of Shifting Weather Patterns

Wisconsin’s increasing precipitation levels, including more frequent extreme weather events, have amplified runoff challenges ^[14]. These changing conditions demand a multi-faceted approach. Solutions like timing fertilizer applications, planting cover crops, restoring wetlands, and incorporating phosphorus-sorbing materials in edge-of-field structures are becoming essential to capture dissolved phosphorus during heavy rains ^[14].

Maintenance and Long-Term Strategies

Regular maintenance is critical to ensuring the long-term success of engineered systems. Practices like WASCoBs (Water and Sediment Control Basins) can reduce suspended solids by up to 80% and phosphorus loads by 85% ^[10]. Even simpler methods, such as street sweeping during fall leaf drop, can significantly lower dissolved phosphorus levels, especially in areas where decaying leaves contribute heavily to stormwater phosphorus ^[8]. Costs for phosphorus abatement vary widely, ranging from $1.88 to $1,065.93 per kilogram removed ^[10], but combining advanced systems with routine maintenance offers a practical path forward.

The Midwest’s experience underscores the importance of tailoring phosphorus filtration solutions to local conditions. By addressing agricultural inputs, soil characteristics, and evolving weather patterns, the region is setting a strong example of how thoughtful planning and advanced technologies can protect water bodies from phosphorus pollution.

3. Florida Phosphorus Filter Systems

Florida’s unique landscape and climate have pushed the state to adopt distinct methods for managing phosphorus compared to other regions. With its flat terrain, high groundwater levels, and frequent heavy rainfall, Florida has developed large-scale phosphorus removal systems to protect critical ecosystems like the Everglades. These methods stand in stark contrast to the approaches used in areas like Maryland or the Midwest.

The Sandy Soil Challenge

Florida’s sandy soils pose a major hurdle for traditional stormwater management systems. In typical bioretention setups, sandy soil removes only about 14% of phosphorus, which is far from sufficient. This challenge has led researchers to explore advanced filtration methods. A 2013 study by Andrew Hood, Manoj Chopra, and Martin Wanielista at the University of Central Florida compared standard sandy soil to a specialized biosorption activated media called Bold & Gold™ – a mix of expanded clay and tire crumb. Field tests on roadside swales showed that Bold & Gold™ achieved impressive results: 71% removal of total phosphorus and 95% removal of soluble phosphorus. For comparison, traditional wet ponds typically achieve around 48% phosphorus removal. With Florida’s Statewide Stormwater Treatment Rule introducing stricter requirements, the need for such advanced systems has become even more urgent ^[15].

Large-Scale Success: The Everglades Protection Program

Florida has taken its phosphorus management efforts to a massive scale with projects like the Everglades Protection Program. Over the past two decades, the state has invested $1.8 billion in phosphorus control initiatives, including the creation of Stormwater Treatment Areas (STAs). These constructed wetlands are designed to restore and protect the Everglades. Before STAs were built, water flowing into the Everglades had phosphorus levels averaging 170 parts per billion (ppb). Today, these levels can drop as low as 11 ppb, and over 90% of the Everglades now meets the ultra-clean standard of 10 ppb or less. Between 1995 and 2011, STAs treated 13.6 billion cubic meters of stormwater, significantly reducing phosphorus concentrations. As of April 2018, combined efforts from best management practices and STA operations have removed over 6,165 metric tons of phosphorus from water entering the Everglades Protection Area ^[17][18].

Cost Considerations and Maintenance

While these systems have achieved remarkable results, their costs and maintenance requirements vary depending on the technology and target phosphorus levels. Managed Aquatic Plant Systems (MAPS), for instance, have shown treatment costs as low as $24 per kilogram of phosphorus removed when reducing levels from 300 to 155 ppb. Reservoir-Assisted STAs cost about $77 per kilogram for reductions from 540 to 40 ppb. However, achieving ultra-low phosphorus levels – such as reducing from 40–180 ppb to meet the Everglades’ strict 10 ppb standard – can cost anywhere from $268 to $1,346 per kilogram, with an average of $772 per kilogram for publicly funded STAs in South Florida ^[16].

Optimal Performance Conditions

Florida’s extensive STA network has highlighted critical factors for effective phosphorus reduction. For optimal performance, inflow phosphorus levels need to be below 100 μg/L, with a phosphorus loading rate under 1.4 g/m²/year and a hydrologic loading rate of 2–6 cm/day ^[17]. These systems rely on a diverse mix of plant and microbial life to maximize nutrient removal. Emergent plants like cattails, pickerel weed, and bulrush store nutrients in decaying organic soils, while submerged plants such as hydrilla, southern naiad, and chara absorb phosphorus directly from the water. Periphyton – a combination of algae and bacteria that grows on plant surfaces – also plays a crucial role in nutrient extraction ^[18].

Florida’s approach to phosphorus management shows how advanced filtration systems and large-scale constructed wetlands can work together to address environmental challenges. By protecting ecosystems like the Everglades, these strategies set an example for effective stormwater management across the country.

sbb-itb-843f8be

Regional Comparison Summary

Phosphorus filtration strategies vary widely across regions, shaped by unique climates, regulations, and challenges. Maryland, the Midwest, and Florida each approach the issue differently, resulting in notable differences in efficiency, costs, and maintenance needs. These regional profiles highlight the balancing act between cost, effectiveness, and upkeep.

Maryland’s Balanced Approach

Maryland stands out for its strict phosphorus permit limits, aligning with states like Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Michigan ^[11]. Its strategy is driven by the Chesapeake Bay restoration efforts, aiming for cost-effective solutions while tackling persistent legacy phosphorus issues. Agriculture plays a major role in the problem, contributing 56% of the total phosphorus load in the Chesapeake Bay watershed ^[20].

One example of the challenge is the Choptank River, where dissolved reactive phosphorus levels rose by 49% over a decade ^[20]. Still, Maryland has made strides in sustainable practices – by 2017, 29% of its cropland had cover crops, well ahead of Pennsylvania’s 13% adoption rate ^[20].

Midwest’s Cost-Conscious Solutions

In the Midwest, phosphorus removal costs range between $42.22 and $60.88 per pound ^[11]. While cost-effective, many systems rely on biological treatments that need significant energy for aeration and often struggle to achieve consistently low phosphorus levels. Chemical removal methods, though effective, come with trade-offs like increased sludge production and higher overall treatment costs ^[11].

Florida’s Advanced Technology Leadership

Florida takes a different path, using advanced technology to achieve impressive phosphorus removal rates. The Bold & Gold™ media, for instance, removes up to 71% of total phosphorus and 95% of soluble phosphorus, with a service life of up to 50 years. While the upfront costs are higher, the long-term benefits include reduced maintenance and exceptional performance.

This media also excels in capacity – one pound can hold 91 mg of dissolved phosphorus ^[19]. Florida’s investment in such technology reflects its commitment to superior water quality solutions.

Climate and Environmental Factors

Regional climates play a big role in determining system performance. Florida’s sandy soils and heavy rainfall demand specialized solutions – traditional sandy soil removes only 14% of phosphorus, while Bold & Gold™ achieves 71% ^[15]. Meanwhile, Maryland faces risks from extreme weather events, which can severely impact water quality ^[20].

"Extreme events represent an acute risk to water quality."
– Peter J. A. Kleinman et al. ^[20]

Legacy phosphorus is a shared challenge across regions, especially in agricultural zones. Nutrients from past fertilizer applications can overwhelm current management practices. For instance, the MANAGE database shows that 4% to 9% of applied fertilizer phosphorus is lost through surface water runoff ^[10], underscoring the difficulty of addressing both historical and new phosphorus sources.

Maintenance and Operational Considerations

Florida’s Bold & Gold™ systems, while requiring a higher initial investment, offer lower operational costs. When the top layer clogs, it can be restored by discing or replacing just the upper layer, extending the system’s lifespan ^[19]. In contrast, traditional wet ponds – common across all regions – achieve about 48% phosphorus removal ^[15] but need more frequent maintenance and deliver less reliable results.

In Maryland, focusing on high-pollution sites has proven effective for improving phosphorus reduction efforts while keeping costs manageable ^[20]. These regional comparisons highlight the importance of tailoring filtration strategies to meet specific environmental goals and stormwater quality standards.

Conclusion

Maryland’s approach to stormwater management highlights the importance of tailoring solutions to meet local challenges and regulatory demands. By focusing on rigorous testing and a thorough approval process, the state has created systems that effectively filter phosphorus and deliver measurable environmental benefits.

However, challenges persist. Urban runoff has become the second-largest source of pollution in Maryland, and while upgrades to wastewater treatment plants have addressed nearly half of the state’s 2025 pollution reduction goals, achieving the remaining targets will require going beyond conventional treatment methods ^[1]. Researchers at the University of Maryland have been at the forefront of developing advanced solutions, such as bioretention strips enhanced with powdered aluminum hydroxide to cut phosphorus discharge, and permeable concrete systems that boost nitrogen removal by up to 75% ^[3].

"Runoff from urban development represents a growing source of pollution to the Chesapeake watershed, and we believe we can help curb this" ^[3].

A broader analysis of stormwater strategies across regions reinforces the idea that no single solution works everywhere. Florida’s Bold & Gold™ phosphorus filter systems ^[19] and the Midwest’s focus on cost-effective designs showcase how regional priorities shape stormwater management tactics. Maryland’s balanced approach – combining strict regulatory standards with cutting-edge scientific research – provides a model for other regions to consider.

Looking ahead, emerging technologies like iron- and biochar-enhanced media hold promise for improving nutrient treatment ^[2]. Maryland is also exploring watershed-scale strategies for more cost-effective management, drawing inspiration from Minnesota’s success with such methods since 1955 ^[2]. With its strong foundation of scientific rigor and regulatory diligence, Maryland is well-positioned to tackle future stormwater management challenges and offer valuable insights to other states.

FAQs

How do phosphorus filters in Maryland’s stormwater systems protect the Chesapeake Bay from pollution?

Phosphorus filters in Maryland’s stormwater systems are key players in safeguarding the Chesapeake Bay. Their job? To strip stormwater runoff of excess phosphorus – a major culprit behind nutrient pollution. When too much phosphorus enters the Bay, it fuels harmful algal blooms and creates low-oxygen zones, both of which pose serious risks to aquatic life.

These filters act as a buffer, intercepting and treating runoff before it flows into nearby waterways. Considering urban runoff is one of Maryland’s biggest pollution sources, these systems are a critical tool in the state’s mission to improve water quality and revive the Chesapeake Bay’s ecosystem.

What challenges does Maryland face in reducing phosphorus pollution through stormwater filtration systems?

Maryland’s Challenges in Reducing Phosphorus Pollution

Maryland faces a tough road in tackling phosphorus pollution, especially when it comes to managing stormwater filtration systems. One of the biggest culprits is agricultural runoff, which accounts for a staggering 64% of the phosphorus entering the Chesapeake Bay. Despite decades of effort, the state has only seen modest improvements in reducing this type of pollution.

Wastewater treatment plants present another hurdle. These facilities play a key role in controlling phosphorus levels, but when they experience breakdowns or inefficiencies, it can throw off the state’s broader pollution control efforts. On top of that, urban and suburban stormwater runoff is becoming a growing concern, further complicating Maryland’s approach to addressing this issue.

All of these factors combine to create a complex challenge. Managing phosphorus pollution in Maryland calls for creative solutions and strong partnerships to safeguard its waterways for the future.

How effective are phosphorus filters in Maryland’s stormwater systems, and which options work best for the state’s diverse soil conditions?

Phosphorus filters in Maryland’s stormwater systems perform differently based on the technology used and the characteristics of local soils. Sand filters, one of the most commonly used methods, can capture up to 60% of phosphorus from runoff. These filters rely on a blend of sand and organic materials to trap pollutants, making them a practical choice for urban and suburban areas. They also require moderate upkeep, which adds to their appeal.

For more intensive phosphorus reduction, biological nutrient removal (BNR) systems at wastewater treatment plants can lower phosphorus concentrations to less than 0.1 mg/L. This level of treatment provides notable environmental benefits, especially for ecosystems like the Chesapeake Bay. However, Maryland’s diverse soil types, which influence water infiltration and pollutant retention, mean there’s no one-size-fits-all solution. A customized mix of systems is often the most effective way to tackle the state’s stormwater management challenges.

Related posts

• Stormwater Pipe Repair: Maryland Compliance Guide
• Top SWPPP Practices for Maryland Sites
• Permeable Pavers for Stormwater Control in Maryland
• Stormwater Filtration: Hydrocarbon Removal Methods